guild icon
Mayflower District Court
#takoyki9876-v-the-port-authority-of-mayflower-and-quanahassit-et-al
This is the start of #takoyki9876-v-the-port-authority-of-mayflower-and-quanahassit-et-al channel.
who
who 2024-09-23 09:48 p.m.
https://trello.com/c/MX8ToXDV/107-takoyki9876-v-the-port-authority-of-mayflower-and-quanahassit-et-al
TAKOYKI9876 v. The Port Authority of Mayflower and Quanahassit et. al.
CASE INFORMATION**

IN THE MAYFLOWER DISTRICT COURT FOR CLARK COUNTY

---

CV-0025-24 TAKOYKI9876 v. THE PORT AUTHORITY OF MAYFLOWER AND QUANAHASSIT, a Mayflower corporation and government entity, NXICO_M, in his quasi-official capacity as the Port Authority Commissioner,

Trial Type: Civil

Judge Assigned:** Judge MamaGobies -...
Labels
Civil
who
who 2024-09-23 09:51 p.m.
CV-0025-24 TAKOYKI9876 v. THE PORT AUTHORITY OF MAYFLOWER AND QUANAHASSIT, a Mayflower corporation and government entity, NXICO_M, in his quasi-official capacity as the Port Authority Commissioner,

Plaintiff @takoyaki

Defendants The Port Authority of Mayflower and Quanahassit, @anti in capacity as Port Authority Commissioner
who
who 2024-09-23 09:54 p.m.
Counsel of record for plaintiff @mike_bn
who
who 2024-09-23 10:02 p.m.
@mike_bn, @anti, @Department of Justice added
urinal cake
urinal cake 2024-09-23 10:06 p.m.
@singhski
takoyaki
takoyaki 2024-09-23 10:13 p.m.
Hello
who
who 2024-09-23 10:22 p.m.
Please have a draft summons prepared for the court. In addition, the timeline for summons under Rule 7(g) of the Rules of Civil Procedure shall begin at the time of the creation of this channel, rather than the date of filing, due to the current backlog of cases.

@mike_bn
whowho
Please have a draft summons prepared for the court. In addition, the timeline for summons under Rule 7(g) of the Rules of Civil Procedure shall begin at the time of the creation of...
mike_bn
mike_bn 2024-09-23 10:25 p.m.
Can I get a format
mike_bn
mike_bn 2024-09-23 10:25 p.m.
cannot find them
mike_bnmike_bn
Can I get a format
who
who 2024-09-23 10:26 p.m.
File in any reasonable format
who
who 2024-09-23 10:27 p.m.
in .pdf format
whowho
File in any reasonable format
mike_bn
mike_bn 2024-09-23 10:30 p.m.
All other judges have issued them for me
mike_bn
mike_bn 2024-09-23 10:30 p.m.
Whats with the change
mike_bnmike_bn
All other judges have issued them for me
who
who 2024-09-23 10:32 p.m.
Ruke(7)(c) require me to issue summons as directed by the plaintiff when more than one defendant is named - two defendants are named. Please provide a summons so that the court may issue it as directed.
who
who 2024-09-23 10:32 p.m.
Rule(7)(c)*
who
who 2024-09-23 10:33 p.m.
I have no idea who the plaintiff would like to be summoned to this action, a draft summons will provide the required direction to the Court as mandated by Rule(7)(c). Thank you!
who
who 2024-09-23 10:35 p.m.
Multiple summons have been issued by the District Court which can be viewed for clarity, as long as the required information is available in the summons and it is in an acceptable format it will be issued as directed.
whowho
Please have a draft summons prepared for the court. In addition, the timeline for summons under Rule 7(g) of the Rules of Civil Procedure shall begin at the time of the creation of...
takoyaki
takoyaki 2024-09-24 12:58 a.m.
If I need to actually have appearence in game or here in real time. I can but, reminder, my time zone is japan standard time and I can't appear at midnight
takoyakitakoyaki
If I need to actually have appearence in game or here in real time. I can but, reminder, my time zone is japan standard time and I can't appear at midnight
who
who 2024-09-24 12:58 a.m.
you have an attorney
takoyaki
takoyaki 2024-09-24 12:58 a.m.
yap
singhski
singhski 2024-09-24 09:20 a.m.
@mike_bn Hi! Did you arbitrate this?
singhski
singhski 2024-09-24 09:23 a.m.
https://discord.com/channels/1274202187911790632/1274202189149114407/1288128629385203724 NoA filed.
morale
morale 2024-09-24 09:36 a.m.
@singhski i'll be taking this
morale
morale 2024-09-24 09:36 a.m.
@who your honor the port authority is not a state agency
morale
morale 2024-09-24 09:36 a.m.
it is a federal compact made by act of congress
morale
morale 2024-09-24 09:37 a.m.
this court lacks jurisdiction to hear this matter
morale
morale 2024-09-24 09:37 a.m.
i am appearing as union of columbia attorney for the district of mayflower rudy giuliani
morale
morale 2024-09-24 09:37 a.m.
singhski
singhski 2024-09-24 09:37 a.m.
Wow! Rudy!
singhski
singhski 2024-09-24 09:37 a.m.
I saw what you did in Borat 2
singhski
singhski 2024-09-24 09:39 a.m.
I wish I could unsee it but I can't
moralemorale
@who your honor the port authority is not a state agency
mike_bn
mike_bn 2024-09-24 11:39 a.m.
its a state company registered with the mayflower department of state acting and enforcing the laws of the state
mike_bn
mike_bn 2024-09-24 11:40 a.m.
@who parties are already here is a summons still needed
mike_bnmike_bn
its a state company registered with the mayflower department of state acting and enforcing the laws of the state
morale
morale 2024-09-24 11:41 a.m.
it is not a state company
morale
morale 2024-09-24 11:41 a.m.
it is an inter-state compact created by resolution of congress
morale
morale 2024-09-24 11:42 a.m.
which handles and protects interstate commerce
morale
morale 2024-09-24 11:42 a.m.
this is not a question for state courts but rather of a federal jurisdiction
who
who 2024-09-24 04:15 p.m.
Is the department of Justice appearing @morale
who
who 2024-09-24 04:15 p.m.
And who is appearing
morale
morale 2024-09-24 04:18 p.m.
@who i am appearing on behalf of the department of justice of the union of columbia
morale
morale 2024-09-24 04:19 p.m.
as union of columbia attorney for the southern district of mayflower
morale
morale 2024-09-24 04:19 p.m.
we respectfully request this court to recognize its lack of jurisdiction over interstate commerce and move this case to the federal jurisdiction
who
who 2024-09-24 04:20 p.m.
Can you file an appearance or pleading with your name on it to appear officially
who
who 2024-09-24 04:35 p.m.
and can the text of the interstate compact be provided @morale
who
who 2024-09-24 04:35 p.m.
and if there are articles of incorporation that exist for the port authority can those be provided as well
morale
morale 2024-09-24 04:59 p.m.
https://trello.com/c/MX8ToXDV/107-takoyki9876-v-the-port-authority-of-mayflower-and-quanahassit-et-al
TAKOYKI9876 v. The Port Authority of Mayflower and Quanahassit et. al.
CASE INFORMATION**

IN THE MAYFLOWER DISTRICT COURT FOR CLARK COUNTY

---

CV-0025-24 TAKOYKI9876 v. THE PORT AUTHORITY OF MAYFLOWER AND QUANAHASSIT, a Mayflower corporation and government entity, NXICO_M, in his quasi-official capacity as the Port Authority Commissioner,

Trial Type: Civil

Judge Assigned:** Judge MamaGobies -...
Comments
1
Labels
Civil
morale
morale 2024-09-24 04:59 p.m.
@who
morale
morale 2024-09-24 04:59 p.m.
defendant hereby notifies the court of the removal of this matter to the federal district courts
who
who 2024-09-24 08:57 p.m.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/12JCu_kHdxoov4r0zsNCngU5-IhUTc0vu/view

Pursuant to the interstate compact establishing the Port Authority of Mayflower and Quanhassit, and because the alleged dispute occured within the State of Mayflower, this court is the proper forum for this action.

The notice of removal is noted but no stay or leave will be granted by the court absent court order from a superior court.

@morale @singhski @mike_bn
FEDERAL COMPACT.pdf
whowho
https://drive.google.com/file/d/12JCu_kHdxoov4r0zsNCngU5-IhUTc0vu/view Pursuant to the interstate compact establishing the Port Authority of Mayflower and Quanhassit, and because ...
morale
morale 2024-09-24 08:59 p.m.
a named defendant is a resident of another state
morale
morale 2024-09-24 08:59 p.m.
please see notice of removal
morale
morale 2024-09-24 08:59 p.m.
once a matter has been removed it cannot continue to be heard by this court
morale
morale 2024-09-24 08:59 p.m.
it has officially been removed to the federal jurisdiction
who
who 2024-09-24 08:59 p.m.
I don't see an order removing the action from a superior court or federal court
morale
morale 2024-09-24 08:59 p.m.
it is up to the federal district court to decide to remand it or not
morale
morale 2024-09-24 08:59 p.m.
actually miss gobies
morale
morale 2024-09-24 08:59 p.m.
the law doesen't mandate that
morale
morale 2024-09-24 08:59 p.m.
the law actually vests sole power of removal
morale
morale 2024-09-24 08:59 p.m.
to the defendant
morale
morale 2024-09-24 08:59 p.m.
as long as the statutory conditions are met
morale
morale 2024-09-24 08:59 p.m.
which they are
morale
morale 2024-09-24 08:59 p.m.
:🙂:
morale
morale 2024-09-24 08:59 p.m.
please do some reading
morale
morale 2024-09-24 08:59 p.m.
might help
who
who 2024-09-24 08:59 p.m.
You are not the defendant
morale
morale 2024-09-24 08:59 p.m.
i am counsel for the defendant
morale
morale 2024-09-24 08:59 p.m.
?
who
who 2024-09-24 09:00 p.m.
File appearance as the defendant's attorney
morale
morale 2024-09-24 09:01 p.m.
happily
who
who 2024-09-24 09:01 p.m.
However, the compact is clear and is also bound by state law regarding this action --

"In the event of any civil dispute or legal action arising from the operations, actions, or omissions of the Port Authority, its subsidiaries, or its personnel, venue shall be proper in the state where the alleged injury, harm, or cause of action occurred."

"For disputes arising within the state of Mayflower, the courts of Mayflower shall have jurisdiction."
morale
morale 2024-09-24 09:02 p.m.
that may be true but the port authority is not the only entity sued
morale
morale 2024-09-24 09:02 p.m.
the only named defendant that can hold citizenship
morale
morale 2024-09-24 09:02 p.m.
is a citizen of quanahassit
who
who 2024-09-24 09:03 p.m.
"Defendant, nxico_M is the current Commissioner for the Port Authority of Mayflower and Quanahassit, alongside being a Resident of the State of Mayflower"
morale
morale 2024-09-24 09:03 p.m.
that is what the plaintiff alleges
who
who 2024-09-24 09:03 p.m.
If you want to factually dispute alleged residency that is fine
morale
morale 2024-09-24 09:04 p.m.
yes the plaintiff has a residence in the state of mayflower
morale
morale 2024-09-24 09:04 p.m.
but they are a citizen of quanahassit
morale
morale 2024-09-24 09:04 p.m.
the law has distinct definitions of resident and citizen
morale
morale 2024-09-24 09:04 p.m.
sure the defendant might hold residence in mayflower
morale
morale 2024-09-24 09:04 p.m.
but the plaintiff does not allege they are a CITIZEN of mayflower
morale
morale 2024-09-24 09:04 p.m.
they are a citizen of quanahassit
who
who 2024-09-24 09:04 p.m.
Does the defendant conduct business within the State of Mayflower as the Commissioner of the Port Authority of Mayflower and Quanahassit?
morale
morale 2024-09-24 09:04 p.m.
thats irrelevant under 1332(a)(1)
morale
morale 2024-09-24 09:05 p.m.
all that needs to be met for removal is
morale
morale 2024-09-24 09:05 p.m.
the defendant being a citizen of another state
morale
morale 2024-09-24 09:05 p.m.
“[t]he district courts shall have original jurisdiction of all civil actions... between citizens of different States.”
morale
morale 2024-09-24 09:05 p.m.
if you would like my client to produce a sworn certificate of quanahassit citizenship
morale
morale 2024-09-24 09:05 p.m.
that can be done
moralemorale
thats irrelevant under 1332(a)(1)
who
who 2024-09-24 09:06 p.m.
Is this law codified by any Mayflower state statute?
morale
morale 2024-09-24 09:07 p.m.
that is a law of the union of columbia your honor
morale
morale 2024-09-24 09:07 p.m.
federal law supercedes state law
morale
morale 2024-09-24 09:07 p.m.
you are aware of the supremacy clause
morale
morale 2024-09-24 09:07 p.m.
i hope
who
who 2024-09-24 09:07 p.m.
SEC. 11. ALLEGIANCE TO THE UNION OF COLUMBIA.
The State of Mayflower shall never secede, and forever remain a member of the Union of Columbia; the people thereof are part of the Union. There is no right on the part of this State to secede, and any attempts to dissolve or sever the Nation, shall be wholly resisted by the State. The laws of the Union of Columbia shall not be enforced by the State, unless such laws have been codified by the Legislature. The laws of the United States of America shall be interchangeable with the laws of the Union of Columbia, and mention of either in context shall be synonymous.
who
who 2024-09-24 09:07 p.m.
"The laws of the Union of Columbia shall not be enforced by the State, unless such laws have been codified by the Legislature."
morale
morale 2024-09-24 09:08 p.m.
when a state constitution and federal constitution conflicts
morale
morale 2024-09-24 09:08 p.m.
the federal constitution holds supremacy
who
who 2024-09-24 09:08 p.m.
The interstate compact is also federal law
who
who 2024-09-24 09:08 p.m.
And supreme over the state's law
morale
morale 2024-09-24 09:08 p.m.
This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.
morale
morale 2024-09-24 09:08 p.m.
Article VI, Clause 2
morale
morale 2024-09-24 09:08 p.m.
of the U.C. Constitution
mike_bn
mike_bn 2024-09-24 09:08 p.m.
holy guacamole
who
who 2024-09-24 09:09 p.m.
The interstate compact directs the state, as law supreme to state law, that this action is to be disputed within the courts of this state.
morale
morale 2024-09-24 09:09 p.m.
oh so youre relying on the interstate compact
morale
morale 2024-09-24 09:09 p.m.
has that been codified by the legistlature?
morale
morale 2024-09-24 09:09 p.m.
i thought you were going off of no laws are valid until codified by our senate
morale
morale 2024-09-24 09:09 p.m.
you cannot have it both ways your honor
who
who 2024-09-24 09:10 p.m.
As inaugral law I assume, yes. If it has not been codified by the legislature then the Port Authority will be treated solely as a corporation with special status under Mayflower law.
morale
morale 2024-09-24 09:10 p.m.
look at this judge
morale
morale 2024-09-24 09:10 p.m.
wishy washier then the french in world war two
morale
morale 2024-09-24 09:11 p.m.
regardless your honor
morale
morale 2024-09-24 09:11 p.m.
the supremacy clause holds clear here
morale
morale 2024-09-24 09:11 p.m.
you have no choice but to enforce federal law in this matter
morale
morale 2024-09-24 09:11 p.m.
not enforce wrong verb
morale
morale 2024-09-24 09:11 p.m.
to stand idly by and do nothing
morale
morale 2024-09-24 09:11 p.m.
as its removed
who
who 2024-09-24 09:11 p.m.
You still need to file a notice of appearance to this action.
morale
morale 2024-09-24 09:12 p.m.
who
who 2024-09-24 09:14 p.m.
As far as I am concerned nxico_M is a resident of the State of Mayflower - his residency in any other state is irrelevant to this action if he is a resident of the State of Mayflower. State law and the interstate compact (which may or may not be in effect) call for this action to be heard in this court as well.
morale
morale 2024-09-24 09:16 p.m.
they are a citizen and resident of the state of quanahassit
morale
morale 2024-09-24 09:16 p.m.
can the defendant prove their residency here?
morale
morale 2024-09-24 09:16 p.m.
my client lives in quanahassit city
who
who 2024-09-24 09:18 p.m.
I can see for myself that nxico_M possesses the rank of "State Resident" within state records and the plaintiff's allegation, absent any evidence otherwise, is enough for me to establish that this court possesses jurisdiction over him and this claim. The defendant's claims to reside in another state are meaningless unless combined with a claim that he does not possess residency in this state. Nothing prevents a person from holding statutory or "legal" residency in two states.
who
who 2024-09-24 09:18 p.m.
The fact that the alleged actions occured in this State and he is the primary agent of the corporate defendant is enough for him to be called.
morale
morale 2024-09-24 09:19 p.m.
residency is legally defined as 182 + 1 days living in a location
morale
morale 2024-09-24 09:19 p.m.
i can cite
morale
morale 2024-09-24 09:19 p.m.
my clients residency is the state of quanhassit
morale
morale 2024-09-24 09:19 p.m.
specifically quanahassit city
morale
morale 2024-09-24 09:19 p.m.
i ask the court issue a stay for the defendants to be able to request the necessary documentation from the quanahassit government
morale
morale 2024-09-24 09:19 p.m.
so that we can properly file a motion to dismiss in this matter
who
who 2024-09-24 09:20 p.m.
Denied
who
who 2024-09-24 09:20 p.m.
You can make the claim in your response to the complaint
morale
morale 2024-09-24 09:20 p.m.
Someones confirmation hearing isn't going to go as they'd like
morale
morale 2024-09-24 09:20 p.m.
Thank you, your honor
morale
morale 2024-09-24 09:20 p.m.
:🙂:
who
who 2024-09-24 09:22 p.m.
Even if nxico_M is an invalid defendant to be joined to the action I would only sever him from the action and not dismiss the action
who
who 2024-09-24 09:22 p.m.
And he would still be the primary agent of the defendant corporation
who
who 2024-09-24 09:22 p.m.
So a stay in the matter is irrelevant to the final disposition of the action
morale
morale 2024-09-24 09:22 p.m.
uc code requires removal to the federal district
morale
morale 2024-09-24 09:22 p.m.
not severance
who
who 2024-09-24 09:26 p.m.
I also order the correction of the Notice of Appearance in regard's to my name and the civil action number @morale
who
who 2024-09-24 09:26 p.m.
And the title of the action
who
who 2024-09-24 09:26 p.m.
Thank you
morale
morale 2024-09-24 09:26 p.m.
No sorry I just think I won't be appearing
morale
morale 2024-09-24 09:26 p.m.
Can't handle a clearly incompetent judge
morale
morale 2024-09-24 09:26 p.m.
Goodbye
who
who 2024-09-24 09:26 p.m.
Ok
morale
morale 2024-09-24 09:28 p.m.
doj and its attorneys are withdrawing @who
morale
morale 2024-09-24 09:28 p.m.
goodbye
morale
morale 2024-09-24 09:30 p.m.
https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/1146601449401368587/1195781426184978442/attachment.gif
who
who 2024-09-24 09:30 p.m.
File a motion to terminate appearance to the court that meets the guidelines found in Rule 12(f)(1) of the Rules of Judicial Administration. @morale
who
who 2024-09-24 09:30 p.m.
I will also be holding you in contempt and ordering a fine of one dollar to be paid to the State of Mayflower. Such order will be written and released shortly.
morale
morale 2024-09-24 09:31 p.m.
contempt for?
who
who 2024-09-24 09:31 p.m.
Contemptuous language to the court.
morale
morale 2024-09-24 09:31 p.m.
"Any player who fails to comply with the orders of a judicial officer while within a courtroom setting shall be guilty of a misdemeanor."
morale
morale 2024-09-24 09:31 p.m.
can you explain which order i refused
morale
morale 2024-09-24 09:31 p.m.
?
who
who 2024-09-24 09:32 p.m.
You were ordered to fix contemptuous language among other faults found in the Notice of Appearance - the contempt will be for failure to repair contemptuous language directed towards the court.
morale
morale 2024-09-24 09:32 p.m.
you ordered me to correct the notice of appearance
morale
morale 2024-09-24 09:32 p.m.
i notified you that i would be withdrawing
morale
morale 2024-09-24 09:32 p.m.
you cannot force an attorney to appear
morale
morale 2024-09-24 09:32 p.m.
by telling me to correct the NOA and punishing me for withdrawing rather then correcting
morale
morale 2024-09-24 09:32 p.m.
you by essence are forcing my appearance as counsel
who
who 2024-09-24 09:33 p.m.
Ok. You will be held in direct contempt with a fine to be paid of one dollar. Repairing any faults now will not change this. The order will be released shortly.
morale
morale 2024-09-24 09:33 p.m.
you failed to set a timeline on your order
morale
morale 2024-09-24 09:33 p.m.
you issued me a punishment within 3 minutes
who
who 2024-09-24 09:33 p.m.
But please do prepare a motion to terminate appearance under Rule 12(f)(1) of the Rules of Judicial Administration.
morale
morale 2024-09-24 09:33 p.m.
of issuing an order
who
who 2024-09-24 09:35 p.m.
This court has an inherent power to find unruly persons in direct contempt. It will utilize this power. May you find peace in life.
who
who 2024-09-24 09:47 p.m.
ORDER FOR CONTEMPT

@morale is found in direct contempt and ordered to pay a fine of one dollar. Mandatorymorale's appearance is also terminated by the court.
who
who 2024-09-24 09:54 p.m.
@mike_bn Would you like the Port Authority to be summoned in lieu of the Department of Justice, given they are not appearing in this case?
whowho
@mike_bn Would you like the Port Authority to be summoned in lieu of the Department of Justice, given they are not appearing in this case?
mike_bn
mike_bn 2024-09-24 10:22 p.m.
Up to the court
who
who 2024-09-25 06:13 p.m.
Ok. I will summon the Port Authority and NXICO_M
who
who 2024-09-25 06:18 p.m.
Summons to port authority to be served
Richo
Richo 2024-09-25 06:21 p.m.
Richo
Richo 2024-09-25 06:22 p.m.
@anti has acknowledged and is here
Richo
Richo 2024-09-25 06:22 p.m.
@who
who
who 2024-09-25 06:24 p.m.
@anti You have access to this channel
anti
anti 2024-09-25 06:24 p.m.
Thank you, your honor.
who
who 2024-09-25 06:24 p.m.
The Department of Justice has declined to represent the Port Authority so the Port Authority will be representing its own interests
who
who 2024-09-25 06:25 p.m.
A response to the complaint is due in five days.
anti
anti 2024-09-27 03:15 p.m.
@who @Danlabs appearing as counsel.
antianti
@who @Danlabs appearing as counsel.
who
who 2024-09-27 10:20 p.m.
File a notice of appearance if you haven’t already
whowho
File a notice of appearance if you haven’t already
anti
anti 2024-09-27 10:21 p.m.
Filed; https://discord.com/channels/1274202187911790632/1274202189149114407/1289391255616225321 https://drive.google.com/file/d/1bgJBvnK6-zUrTKtJqWJ_Qi-rEjkZ0n2c/view?usp=sharing
NOA - CV202524.pdf
antianti
Filed; https://discord.com/channels/1274202187911790632/1274202189149114407/1289391255616225321 https://drive.google.com/file/d/1bgJBvnK6-zUrTKtJqWJ_Qi-rEjkZ0n2c/view?usp=sharing
who
who 2024-09-27 10:23 p.m.
Upload the .pdf directly
anti
anti 2024-09-28 12:01 a.m.
@who The NOA has been re-filed with a direct .pdf file; https://discord.com/channels/1274202187911790632/1274202189149114407/1289430694992547961
who
who 2024-09-28 12:01 a.m.
ok @anti
mike_bn
mike_bn 2024-09-29 04:20 p.m.
@who when is their reply due
mike_bn
mike_bn 2024-09-29 04:20 p.m.
the 30th correct? 5 days from the 25th
who
who 2024-09-29 07:11 p.m.
@Danlabs added
Danlabs
Danlabs 2024-09-29 07:12 p.m.
hello your honour
Danlabs
Danlabs 2024-09-29 07:13 p.m.
due to the unfortunate latency between my NOA being filed and actually added I’d like to ask for some leniency in the timeframe as we look to settle out of court
Danlabs
Danlabs 2024-09-29 07:56 p.m.
cc @takoyaki @mike_bn
who
who 2024-09-29 08:07 p.m.
@Danlabs are you in settlement negotiations now?
Danlabs
Danlabs 2024-09-29 08:25 p.m.
yes, me and mr insertreality are beginning talks
mike_bn
mike_bn 2024-09-30 03:32 p.m.
@who we have reached an agreement
mike_bn
mike_bn 2024-09-30 03:32 p.m.
it is going to be put in writing by the end of the day
Danlabs
Danlabs 2024-09-30 05:14 p.m.
^
who
who 2024-09-30 06:47 p.m.
Ok
whowho
Ok
mike_bn
mike_bn 2024-10-01 02:33 p.m.
plaintiff request this matter be dismissed with prejudice
mike_bnmike_bn
plaintiff request this matter be dismissed with prejudice
who
who 2024-10-01 03:09 p.m.
Why
whowho
Why
mike_bn
mike_bn 2024-10-01 04:23 p.m.
parties have settled out of court
mike_bn
mike_bn 2024-10-01 04:24 p.m.
a term of this settlement is dismissing this case, so we want it with prejudice please
mike_bnmike_bn
parties have settled out of court
who
who 2024-10-01 05:11 p.m.
Provide the settlement agreement
who
who 2024-10-01 05:12 p.m.
In written form
whowho
Provide the settlement agreement
mike_bn
mike_bn 2024-10-01 06:06 p.m.
in that case, the plaintiff abandons this matter
mike_bn
mike_bn 2024-10-01 06:07 p.m.
this is an out of court settlement for a reason
mike_bn
mike_bn 2024-10-01 06:07 p.m.
this will be my final message, thank you
mike_bnmike_bn
in that case, the plaintiff abandons this matter
who
who 2024-10-01 06:47 p.m.
If you want the settlement enforceable by court order provide the settlement
who
who 2024-10-01 06:51 p.m.
If I dismiss with prejudice you will be unable to pursue any of the original claims and will only be able to pursue the contractual settlement agreement do you understand this
who
who 2024-10-01 06:52 p.m.
These are questions that you are ordered to respond to @mike_bn
who
who 2024-10-01 06:53 p.m.
Failure to respond will result in contempt or sanctions against you
who
who 2024-10-01 07:11 p.m.
You don’t need to reveal the settlement if those stipulations are understood
who
who 2024-10-01 07:12 p.m.
And a proper motion is filed
who
who 2024-10-01 07:22 p.m.
I also require confirmation from the defendant(s) that a settlement has been reached out of court and that they have agreed that this settlement should not be enforceable by court order and that this action should be dismissed with prejudice @anti
whowho
I also require confirmation from the defendant(s) that a settlement has been reached out of court and that they have agreed that this settlement should not be enforceable by court ...
anti
anti 2024-10-01 07:26 p.m.
Myself and my counsel have agreed and signed off on the out-of-court settlement.
antianti
Myself and my counsel have agreed and signed off on the out-of-court settlement.
who
who 2024-10-01 07:26 p.m.
Are you a bar certified by chance
who
who 2024-10-01 07:27 p.m.
If you aren’t bar certified the corporate defendant will need to agree to a stipulation of dismissal through a member of the state bar
who
who 2024-10-01 07:28 p.m.
Otherwise this case will result in dismissal for want of prosecution (assuming the Plaintiff refuses to provide a motion or stipulation of dismissal) and no agreement against the corporate defendant will be enforceable, only against you personally
who
who 2024-10-01 07:36 p.m.
I don't see you listed in the bar database so you are unlicensed to represent the corporate defendant - this means any dismissal will not effect the rights of the plaintiff to bring another case against the corporation. They will be free to bring another case against the Port Authority, but not you. This also means that you alone are being held responsible to any agreement made with the Plaintiff, not the corporate defendant. Do you understand this?
who
who 2024-10-01 07:37 p.m.
@anti
who
who 2024-10-01 07:37 p.m.
If these things are not amenable to you I suggest you confer with counsel or work with the Plaintiff to prepare a stipulation of dismissal with prejudice.
whowho
Otherwise this case will result in dismissal for want of prosecution (assuming the Plaintiff refuses to provide a motion or stipulation of dismissal) and no agreement against the c...
mike_bn
mike_bn 2024-10-01 08:05 p.m.
the agreement is a contract and thus enforcable
mike_bn
mike_bn 2024-10-01 08:05 p.m.
we require nothing further from the court
mike_bn
mike_bn 2024-10-01 08:05 p.m.
thank you
mike_bnmike_bn
the agreement is a contract and thus enforcable
who
who 2024-10-01 08:07 p.m.
I require a filed stipulation of dismissal
who
who 2024-10-01 08:07 p.m.
Failure to supply one will result in what I described above and then sanctions against you
who
who 2024-10-01 08:07 p.m.
There will be a one day period for this to be supplied
whowho
There will be a one day period for this to be supplied
mike_bn
mike_bn 2024-10-01 08:08 p.m.
what do you want
mike_bn
mike_bn 2024-10-01 08:08 p.m.
plaintiff abandons this matter
mike_bn
mike_bn 2024-10-01 08:09 p.m.
we dont need it with prejudice
mike_bn
mike_bn 2024-10-01 08:09 p.m.
we have the right to abandon at any time
mike_bn
mike_bn 2024-10-01 08:09 p.m.
with no strings attached
mike_bnmike_bn
plaintiff abandons this matter
who
who 2024-10-01 08:09 p.m.
The plaintiff can abandon whatever they want - you personally will be sanctioned for failure to properly file a dismissal or stipulation of dismissal.
mike_bn
mike_bn 2024-10-01 08:09 p.m.
except in cases of abuse of process
whowho
The plaintiff can abandon whatever they want - you personally will be sanctioned for failure to properly file a dismissal or stipulation of dismissal.
mike_bn
mike_bn 2024-10-01 08:09 p.m.
so you want a written notification we are abandoning?
who
who 2024-10-01 08:09 p.m.
I want a written motion to dismiss or stipulation or dismissal
mike_bn
mike_bn 2024-10-01 08:09 p.m.
okay
who
who 2024-10-01 08:10 p.m.
It is your duty to your client to have his case dismissed properly
who
who 2024-10-01 08:10 p.m.
Failure to do this will result in sanctions against you as an attorney
mike_bn
mike_bn 2024-10-01 08:10 p.m.
well i figured letting you know would be fine
mike_bn
mike_bn 2024-10-01 08:10 p.m.
what is with the sanctions man
mike_bn
mike_bn 2024-10-01 08:10 p.m.
you can just tell me what you want and ill do it
mike_bn
mike_bn 2024-10-01 08:10 p.m.
no need to threaten me
who
who 2024-10-01 08:10 p.m.
I told you what I want multiple times
mike_bn
mike_bn 2024-10-01 08:10 p.m.
you wanted the contract
who
who 2024-10-01 08:10 p.m.
I want a motion to dismiss or stipulation of dismissal or an enforceable settlement agreement
mike_bn
mike_bn 2024-10-01 08:10 p.m.
okay
who
who 2024-10-01 08:10 p.m.
These are the only routes a case can close
mike_bn
mike_bn 2024-10-01 08:10 p.m.
please stop throwing the sanctions word around
mike_bn
mike_bn 2024-10-01 08:11 p.m.
ill get you the dismissal
who
who 2024-10-01 08:14 p.m.
@anti also needs to affirm that he agrees this claim can be brought again against the port authority for me to accept a dismissal on the basis of an out of court settlement between you and him. The rights of the port authority need to be considered in dismissal and if I believe @anti has fraudulently settled on behalf of the port authority as an attorney I will order a hearing on the settlement to ensure you are best representing your client and that @anti is not operating under the auspice of the port authority rather than himself.
mike_bn
mike_bn 2024-10-01 08:15 p.m.
mike_bn
mike_bn 2024-10-01 08:16 p.m.
here is our notice as required by mayfl. civ. pro. r. 31 (a)
whowho
@anti also needs to affirm that he agrees this claim can be brought again against the port authority for me to accept a dismissal on the basis of an out of court se...
mike_bn
mike_bn 2024-10-01 08:19 p.m.
am i allowed to reply or will i get “sanctioned”?
who
who 2024-10-01 08:19 p.m.
@mike_bn do you understand that this court has 0 knowledge on whether or not the claims against the port authority are resolved or not
mike_bn
mike_bn 2024-10-01 08:20 p.m.
am i allowed to answer
who
who 2024-10-01 08:20 p.m.
i can dismiss the claim against @anti with prejudice but without understand under what capacity @anti is operating i cannot dismiss the claims against the port authority either way
who
who 2024-10-01 08:20 p.m.
answer
mike_bn
mike_bn 2024-10-01 08:20 p.m.
no prejudice then
who
who 2024-10-01 08:20 p.m.
without understanding*
mike_bn
mike_bn 2024-10-01 08:20 p.m.
we abandoned
mike_bn
mike_bn 2024-10-01 08:20 p.m.
that is all that is required from the court
who
who 2024-10-01 08:20 p.m.
if you have reached an agreement with nxico i am required to dismiss those claims with prejudice
mike_bn
mike_bn 2024-10-01 08:20 p.m.
idk what rule ur citing
who
who 2024-10-01 08:20 p.m.
as you have resolved those claims
mike_bn
mike_bn 2024-10-01 08:20 p.m.
where you need to do a hearing
mike_bn
mike_bn 2024-10-01 08:21 p.m.
defendant on the advice of their counsel have settled this outside of the court
who
who 2024-10-01 08:21 p.m.
there are two defendants
who
who 2024-10-01 08:21 p.m.
if nxico_m has appeared here as counsel for both himself and the port authority fraud has occured in his entrance into an agreement with you
who
who 2024-10-01 08:22 p.m.
if criminal conduct has occurred in my court a hearing will be held to ensure that both parties have been represented fairly and the claims should be dismissed as requested
Danlabs
Danlabs 2024-10-01 08:29 p.m.
im sorry?
anti
anti 2024-10-01 08:29 p.m.
how has fraud occurred in this settlement
Danlabs
Danlabs 2024-10-01 08:29 p.m.
this is a civil case your honor
who
who 2024-10-01 08:29 p.m.
I haven't said fraud has occured
who
who 2024-10-01 08:29 p.m.
I'm saying that if you made an agreement on behalf of the Port Authority as an attorney
who
who 2024-10-01 08:29 p.m.
You will be heard here as a litigant and "attorney"
Danlabs
Danlabs 2024-10-01 08:29 p.m.
the commissioner signed off on all the terms i laid out
who
who 2024-10-01 08:29 p.m.
For possible contempt or other sanctions
Danlabs
Danlabs 2024-10-01 08:29 p.m.
we have resolved this, in writing
who
who 2024-10-01 08:30 p.m.
The port authority or the commissioner?
who
who 2024-10-01 08:30 p.m.
Two separate legal persons
Danlabs
Danlabs 2024-10-01 08:30 p.m.
the comissioner, represents the port authority
Danlabs
Danlabs 2024-10-01 08:30 p.m.
theres one, technical defendant here
who
who 2024-10-01 08:30 p.m.
He cannot represent the Port Authority here - it is a registerred corporation under law.
Danlabs
Danlabs 2024-10-01 08:30 p.m.
in that sense then, i am the PA's legal guy
Danlabs
Danlabs 2024-10-01 08:30 p.m.
so therefore i am representing
who
who 2024-10-01 08:31 p.m.
The only problem here is that @anti interests and the Port Authority's are not the same - they are additionally not the same person at all.
who
who 2024-10-01 08:32 p.m.
I can't dismiss claims against the Port Authority because the Port Authority hasn't claimed to come to an agreement with the Plaintiff - only Mexico has
Danlabs
Danlabs 2024-10-01 08:32 p.m.
your honour
who
who 2024-10-01 08:32 p.m.
I can dismiss the claims against him with prejudice
Danlabs
Danlabs 2024-10-01 08:32 p.m.
my signature is also on that document
Danlabs
Danlabs 2024-10-01 08:32 p.m.
and as the representing attorney, i attest that this is the intrests of the port authority at large
Danlabs
Danlabs 2024-10-01 08:32 p.m.
i beg of you to accept the terms that both parties have agreed to
DanlabsDanlabs
i beg of you to accept the terms that both parties have agreed to
who
who 2024-10-01 08:33 p.m.
Ok so you agree to the plaintiff's request for dismissal without prejudice on behalf of the Port Authority?
Danlabs
Danlabs 2024-10-01 08:33 p.m.
yes
who
who 2024-10-01 08:33 p.m.
And understand that these claims may be brought again?
Danlabs
Danlabs 2024-10-01 08:34 p.m.
yes
Danlabs
Danlabs 2024-10-01 08:34 p.m.
this isnt my first rodeo your honour
who
who 2024-10-01 08:34 p.m.
Does the settlement between the Port Authority and the Plaintiff involve government money or any specific action made by the government? @Danlabs
who
who 2024-10-01 08:35 p.m.
If it does I will allow the Department of Justice a chance to intervene
Danlabs
Danlabs 2024-10-01 08:35 p.m.
no, just money from the defendant nxico
Danlabs
Danlabs 2024-10-01 08:35 p.m.
and then some amendments made to internal policy
who
who 2024-10-01 08:35 p.m.
So it requires specific actions on behalf of the Port Authority and monetary compensation from the nxico?
who
who 2024-10-01 08:35 p.m.
From nxico*
Danlabs
Danlabs 2024-10-01 08:36 p.m.
nxico will pay from their own coffers, the PA will amend its policy to reflect the changes agreed upon
who
who 2024-10-01 08:46 p.m.
I am unsure if the Port Authority possesses the authority to enter into contracts with private persons absent statutory approval or the action of the Department of Justice. This settlement is also being done outside of Rule 33 of the Rules of Civil Procedure and typical settlement procedure relating to state agencies, and is therefore unenforceable by the Court. I will allow dismissal without prejudice. Both parties are notified that this sort of settlement is risky and not supported by the Court and is likely to run into procedural issues should either party seek enforcement of your agreement in this Court. Thank you! God bless.

I will also notify @Solicitor General's Office that a quasi-state agency has entered into an agreement for specific performance absent their involvement.
mike_bn
mike_bn 2024-10-01 08:46 p.m.
sounds amazing
who
who 2024-10-01 08:47 p.m.
dismissed without prejudice against both defendants
who
who 2024-10-01 08:53 p.m.
I also recuse on all matters relating to this action in the future as I have alerted the Department of Justice of possible criminal activity in this action. God bless you!
mike_bn
mike_bn 2024-10-01 09:28 p.m.
lol
Danlabs
Danlabs 2024-10-02 12:03 a.m.
the doj came and went... by all means the mayflower doj couldnt even intervene! we're a bi-state corporation with a federal compact!
Exported 314 messages